Restoring the Earth by Restoring Human Dignity
Could western civilization’s oldest ethical instructions have relevance to our newest environmental problems?
Could restoring respect for human beings be the key to restoring the health of the planet?
What we know, I think, is that over the years the ingenuity, the genius, the imagination of the organizations, social entrepreneurs, of engineers, of designers, of individuals has created a powerful arsenal of tools to address what ails us in the world. And the financial and technical means are in place to restore the needs of the biosphere and society. There’s no question about that.
It has been said by many that we cannot save this planet unless there’s widespread spiritual or religious awakening.
Could western civilization’s oldest ethical instructions have relevance to our newest environmental problems? Could restoring respect for human beings be the key to restoring the health of the planet?
This is The Golden Rule: Restoring the Earth by Restoring Human Dignity.
If human beings were truly respected, could the Earth be restored?
Paul Hawken: “In her work, which I recommend, The Great Transformation by Karen Armstrong, she details the origins of our religious traditions in what’s called the axial age period between 200 and 900 BCE. This is a time when much of the world turned away from violence and cruelty and barbarity. There was such an upwelling of philosophy, and insight, intellect in that period that is carried forth in the work of Socrates and Sophocles, and Lao Tzu, Confucius, Mencius, the Buddha, Rabbi Hillel and others.
But rather than religious institutions, these teachers were bringing forth social movements that addressed human suffering.
Later, they were called Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Monotheistic Judaism, democracy, and philosophical rationalism. But in their origin these were not theocratic systems, they did not require belief, they required practice, action. They were not trying to create doctrinaire institutions but compassionate society. They asked their students to question and challenge everything, to never take anything on faith. They urged people to change how they acted in the world, and all that relied on one common principle, the golden rule. Do not ever, ever, do anything to anything or anyone that you would not have done to yourself. Rabbi Hillel said, don’t do anything to your neighbor you wouldn’t do to yourself. That is the Torah, read it. All the rest is commentary. That’s it, if you get that, right?
These were not theocratic systems. They didn’t require belief, they required a change in behavior. Armstrong again, this is a quote, “The axial sages were not interested in providing their disciples with a little edifying uplift after which they could return with renewed vigor to their self centered lives.” Their objective was to create an entirely different kind of human being. Sages insisted that people abandon their egotism and greed, their violence and unkindness. And not only was it wrong to kill another human being, you must not even speak a hostile word about or towards that person, not even make an irritable gesture. Further you cannot combine your benevolence to your own people. Your concern must somehow extend to the entire world. If people behave with kindness and generosity to others they could save the world.
Axial sages lived in a time of war. Their goal was to understand the source of violence, not to combat it. Their practices guided the mind with very simple precepts that slowly and gradually changed the heart. Enlightened was not the goal, kindness, action and compassion were.
These teachings, these teachings are the source of charity in the world. They are the source of NGOs, of philanthropy, of institutes, of collectives, of alliances, of faith-based organizations. These teachings are the source of what it is that we are creating to this day.
Extract from podcast - www.bioneers.org
(Full transcript at http://www.bioneers.org/node/2792)
